Thus Spoke Lenin: Aesopian Language and Cultural Imperialism

[I] trust that this pamphlet will help the reader to understand the fundamental economic question [of Aesopian Language], that of the economic essence of [Cultural] Imperialism, for unless this is studied, it will be impossible to understand and appraise [Financial Warfare, Weltanschauungskrieg] and Modern Politics.

-Vladimir Lenin, Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism, ca. April 26, 1917

Aesopian Language is not only a great way to evade Censorship; it can become a competitive exercise of creativity and critical thinking skills. Personally, I always Italicize, Boldface, and Underline my Markers whilst specifying the “Screens” in Quotation Marks or, in this Blog post, ‘Screens’ in Apostrophes. As the Author under the Intents of Command and Obedience, I have a Constitutional Obligation and Constitutional Intent to ensure that the Readers of The Fourth Estate are aware of my Explicit Intents and Implicit Intents. This is important most practitioners of Aesopian Language do not rely on such methods because they are constantly trying to evade the Postmodernist as they Deconstruct their rhetoric, uncovering the Implicit Intent and One-Time Pad of their encrypted Messages. Together with the Historical Context, proficiency at Deconstruction and the Dark Art of Weltanschauungskrieg (Worldview Warfare), I am able to decrypt the Messages and their corresponding Answers.

Today, I will be revisiting in the Aesopian Language exercises from the English Composition classes of my Catholic high school years. Below is a perfect example where Aesopian Language, Deconstruction, and the Dark Art of Weltanschauungskrieg can be readily employed by heart. The Reader is more than welcome to evaluate (and perhaps even reevaluate) my own handiwork.

When publishing anything, always try to make a lasting impression in the Court of Law. “I only speak the Truth, the Whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth!”

Scenario: On CSPAN (Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network), Members of Congress in the House and Senate are debating over whether the Pledge of Allegiance should either be reformed or banned. There is a growing consensus inside of the Federalist Party and the parties of its United Front that the Pledge of Allegiance, when Jeffersonians of the Democratic-Republican Party adopted and later revised it, still has pro-Hitlerist undertones.

Some Members of Congress are aligned with the Senator from California, who supports the UFSE (Unified Federalist Student Economy) and his Socialist constituents’ advocacy for a Federal Reform. Everyone else supports the Senator from Florida, who is in favor of a Federal Ban because his Nationalist constituents’ passionate belief that the ‘Pledge of Allegiance is Un-American, Anti-Hamiltonian and Antisemitic.’    

“‘This is America, not the ‘Third Reich!’” the Florida Senator warned. “The Student Government’s Parent-Teacher Cooperatives and the UFSE (Unified Federalist Student Economy) should not be clicking the back of their heels, raising their right arm high above their shoulders at Old Glory to profess the Pledge of Allegiance in the Homeroom before morning classes.” The Florida Senator mimics the posture at the camera and on live television and digital livestream, proceeding to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in an act of pure shock value.

“At a signal from the Principal the pupils, in ordered ranks, hands to the side, face the Flag. Another signal is given; every pupil gives the flag the military salute – right hand lifted, palm downward, to align with the forehead and close to it. Standing thus, all repeat together, slowly, ‘I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands; one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.’ At the words, ‘to my Flag,’ the right hand is extended gracefully, palm upward, toward the Flag, and remains in this gesture till the end of the affirmation; whereupon all hands immediately drop to the side.” (Description of the Original Pledge of Allegiance in US Magazine “The Youth’s Companion,” 65 (1892): 446)
Pledge of Allegiance (1915)
Pledge of Allegiance (1930)
Their Pledge of Allegiance” (1930s)
Our Pledge of Allegiance (1942)
Their “Other Pledge of Allegiance” (1930s)
Unidentified Man’s Refusal to Pledge Allegiance (1930s)

Maybe it is not a good idea to be convincing all of humanity to become racial caricatures of the American people by compelling them to become Debt-Slaves based on “Blood and Soil” and “Blood and Wealth.” I say this as an American deeply concerned about the Americanization of Humanity by the Jeffersonian Empire of Liberty vis-à-vis “Cultural Globalization.” There is an Implicit Intent behind my consultation of works written by people like “Oswald Spengler” or “Ernst Jünger,” seeing how they had always been accused by the Jeffersonians of condoning Hitlerism (and somehow, by extension, Jeffersonianism). But there is no indication that Spengler or Jünger had been advocating for Jeffersonianism (and by extension, Hitlerism). My Intent pertains to the obscure historical reality, unbeknownst to most Americans, I am fully aware of the fact that Weimar Germany was extensively Americanized due to Economic ForeignizationTherefore, in retrospect, there a better way for the Federal government to determine US Citizenship beyond Good and Evil, beyond Jus Sanguinis and Jus Soli?

-Third Place: The Socialist Conception of Citizenship (Pt. I of II)

He turned away from the camera and continued addressing his fellow Senators and the Vice President of the United States. “What does that gesture convey to the ‘Jewish Socialist Senator and his fellow Jewish Representatives in the House?’ What does that convey to the ‘Gentile Senators who have Jewish families and their Rabbis among their constituents?’ What’s next, greeting our fellow Americans with ‘God Bless America!’ or Pictures of the Eternal Secretary and the Eternal President with ‘God Bless Hamilton!?’ ‘Why not ban the current one and revisit the original Pledge of Allegiance from Francis Bellamy?’”

Intent: Arthur Moeller van den Bruck’s“Every People has their own Socialism” from his 1923 Political Treatise, Das Dritte Reich, is also the Literary Plot of Avi’s 1991 Historical Novel,Nothing but the Truth: A Documentary Novel. But unlike Avi, van den Bruck warned the reader in the Preface to Das Dritte Reich: “The Third Reich is but a philosophical idea and not for this world, but for the hereafter. [America] could well perish dreaming the Third Reich dream.”

One-Time Pad:“God Bless America, Land that I love / Stand beside Her and guide Her / Through the night with the light from above / From the mountains to the prairies / To the oceans white with foam / God bless America, my home sweet home / God bless America, my home sweet home!”

Message: The Pledge of Allegiance no longer defines the true Goodness and Greatness of America. May God have mercy on the American people for imposing Cultural Imperialism on Weimar Germany, thereby allowing the Hitlerists to make a complete mockery of that salute.

Answer: There should be a Federal Reform for the Pledge of Allegiance. Francis Bellamy never included ‘God’ in the original version. “Only a God can save US!”

Categories: Politics

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: