Weltgefühl: “Conservative Socialism contra Liberal Capitalism”
“Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency. Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.”-Mao Zedong, Combat Liberalism, ca. 1937
“Liberalism has undermined civilization, has destroyed religions, has ruined nations. Primitive peoples know no Liberalism. The world for them is a simple place where one man shares with another. Instinctively they conceive existence as a struggle in which all those who belong in any way to one group must defend themselves against those who threaten them. Great States have always held Liberalism in check. When a great individual arose amongst them who gave the course of their history a new direction, they have been able to incorporate him into their tradition, to make his achievements contribute to their continuity.”-Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Das Dritte Reich, ca. 1923
“The thinking Conservative knows that the outward signs of disorder, personal or social, very often are no more than the symptoms of an inner ravaging sickness, not to be put down by ointments and cosmetics. He is inclined to look for the real causes of our troubles in the heart of man – in our ancient proclivity toward sin, in a loneliness of spirit that conjures up devils, in twisted historical roots beneath the parched ground of modern existence, in venerable impulses of human nature which, when frustrated, make our life one long lingering death. He knows, moreover, that the task for the prudent counselor and the prudent statesman is to make life tolerable, not to make it perfect.”-Russell Kirk, Prospects for Conservatives, ca. 1989
“The Conservative is the man who refuses to believe that the aim of our existence is fulfilled in one short span; the man who believes that our existence only carries on an aim. He sees that one life is not enough to create the things which a man’s mind and a man’s will design. He sees that we as men are born each in a given age, but that we only continue what other men have begun, and that others again take over where we leave off. [T]he Conservative [Mind] ponders on what is ephemeral, and obsolete and unworthy; he ponders also on what is enduring and what is worthy to endure. He recognizes the power that links past and future; he recognizes the enduring element in the transitory present. His far-seeing eye ranges through space beyond the limits of the temporary horizon.”-Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Das Dritte Reich, ca. 1923
The Korean Peninsula offers a number of important lessons to consider. Everything that I am going to discuss here pertains to the Socialist conceptions of political freedom, citizenship and the Meaningful Work/Meaningless Work Distinction. The DPRK (North Korea) and the ROK (South Korea) are behaving like the Doppelgänger of the German Reich and the Federalist American Union on both sides of the 38th Parallel. This is interesting because, of the five aforementioned nations whose Currencies are backing the JDS–the World Reserve Currency of the World State Organization (WSO), Germany and America are nowhere near the Korean Peninsula. The other three, Russia, China and Japan, exist around the vicinity of that region.
To begin, there is the DPRK-ROK issue of “Fordism-Taylorism” and the “Fractional-Reserve Banking System.” Fordism-Taylorism deters the North Koreans from adhering to Juche and Songun Policy, while it is causing scores of South Koreans to succumb to “Death-from-Overwork” like the Japanese. Fractional-Reserve Banking prevents the North Koreans from electrifying their half of Korea and being self-sufficient, whereas the South Koreans are incapable of living within their own means of production and defending themselves against Financial Warfare attacks.
Next, one must ponder why the DPRK appears “outdated” and “antiquated” to Liberal Capitalists on the Technology side of things. One must also ponder why the ROK appears “outdated” and “antiquated” to American Conservative Socialists on the Technology side of things. It is quite possible that the DPRK is voluntarily choosing to reject specific conceptions of Technology on grounds that it is too Liberal Capitalist and therefore antithetical to the ontological essence of what it means to be Korean. If so, then any Liberal Capitalist conception of Technology is also antithetical to the ontological essence of all Western nations like America and Germany.
Finally, North Koreans and South Koreans alike are concerned about the increasingly apparent limitations of how America and Germany should determine citizenship. This particular matter ties in with the previous three considerations and a recent comment that I had made on another Blog recently.
Korean Weltgefühl: “A Socialism of Our Style”
“The time has come when we Korean people have to unite our strength to build a new, democratic Korea. People from all strata should display patriotic enthusiasm and turn out to build a new Korea. To contribute [Arbeit] positively to the Arbeit of building the State [as the Total Productive Potential], let those with strength give strength, let those with knowledge give knowledge, let those with Geld give Geld, and let all people who truly love their country, their nation and democracy unite closely and build an independent and sovereign democratic state.”-Kim Il-sung, Victory Speech in Pyongyang, ca. 1945
“A [Hamiltonian Federalist] spirit of competition – that’s what makes America great [again]. [It] compels us to reach higher than what we think we can. That’s what I like about our new [Unified Federal-State Tournament System]. It’s an exciting blend of strategy and speed, the competition is fast and furious, but it is also intelligent and entertaining. The player that wins has to have more than just knowledge – they have to have the Will-to-Power [and the Figure of the Arbeiter]. That’s what it’s all about.”-Donald Trump, Trump Card Advertisement, ca. 1990
The Work-Standard is specifically designed to be dependence on the performance and well-being of everyone involved in the workspaces of a Socialist nation. This “workspace” can be of any Vocation, Profession, Enterprise, Industry, and Sector in the SSE and VCS Economy, in the Reciprocal-Reserve Banking System, the Council State, and in the national Intranet. When the SMP Compendium repeatedly stresses “the highest Quality of Arbeit for the least Quality of Geld,” there is a specific metaphysical and ontological process at play. Fulfilling my own Command Responsibilities on this particular matter, I can personally attest that Fordism-Taylorism has no place anywhere in the workspaces of any nation. What guides the ethical and moral implications of this philosophical discussion is of course the Political Organization Problem and the Economic Calculation Problem.
As the Reciprocal-Reserve Banking System sends them their Eviction Notices, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek have yet to be evicted from the premises of every workspace in the Socialist world order. Both men are counting on Henry Ford and Frederick Taylor to regain command and control over the production process. What they do not realize is that the Work-Standard offers no compromises, no reservations, no accommodations for Fordism-Taylorism and this will be enforced under international law by the World State Organization.
The business model of Henry Ford has demonstrated a consistent distrust of Finance and Accounting as being necessary in the political-economic-social life of any Totality and their Socialist nation. Ford’s distrust is driven by the so-called “Pop Culture” of Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican Party propaganda that accuses “Jews,” “Socialists” and especially “Jewish Socialists” like Alexander Hamilton of ‘perpetuating Capitalism’. His hostility toward Hamiltonianism, egregious Antisemitism and acceptance of Producerism and Consumerism are all ideological alignments with Jeffersonianism-Hitlerism-Trotskyism. Since Taylorism is the other half of Fordism-Taylorism, we can argue the same for Frederick Winslow Taylor because Fordism cannot exist without Taylorism.
Therefore, what happens if I were to replace Quality of Arbeit (QW) and Quality of Geld (QM) with “Quantity of Arbeit” and “Quantity of Geld?”
Metaphysics of “Quantity of Arbeit” and “Quantity of Geld”: The best-possible Quantity of Decisions, under the best-possible Quantity of Incentives, yields the best-possible Quantity of Outcomes. The greatest Quantity of Arbeit for the least Quantity of Geld will result in the Economic Calculation Problem of Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek.
Here is what the Metaphysics truly are throughout the entirety of the SMP Compendium:
Metaphysics of Quality of Arbeit and Quality of Geld: The best-possible Quality of decisions, under the best-possible Quality of Intents, yields the best-possible Quality of outcomes. The greatest Quality of Arbeit for the least Quality of Geld will result in the Political Organization Problem of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger.
Knowing the difference between Quality and Quantity is crucial in the production process. The Figure of the Arbeiter works together with Comrades in mobilizing the Technology to build the Final Product under Total Mobilization of Production for Dasein. They achieve Sustainability in the production process by striking the right balance in the Quality of Goods and Services against the Frequency for those same Goods and Services. If they are able to maintain a high-enough Quality of Arbeit, they will be able to achieve a low-enough Quality of Geld. Put another way, they can manufacture an array of competitive, affordable goods and services without letting anything go to waste.
Similar to the Soviet Union and German Reich, PRC and Vietnam, Yugoslavia and Hungary, North Korea’s economic planning is still relying on the same set of flaws but nevertheless is worthy enough to be a category of its own. NKEP (North Korean-Type Economic Planning) is split into two variants, “Ilwŏnhwa” (Unified Planning) and “Saebunhwa” (Detailed Planning). Both are essentially the Korean equivalent of the Prussian Befehlstaktik (Command-Type Tactics) as opposed to the Work-Standard’s Prussian Auftragstaktik (Mission-Type Tactics) employed in MTEP (Mission-Type Economic Planning). I will compare and contrast NKEP and MTEP below:
- Ilwŏnhwa involves having the economic planners scattered throughout every town, city, and province coordinating with the central planners in Pyongyang. Embedded within large enterprises, villages, towns and cities are the economic planners subordinates, relaying information and statistical data to the best of their ability, avoiding “bureaucratic and local biases” as much as possible.
- Saebunhwa involves having the economic planners create a draft economic plan based on Statistics and the Scientific Method. The economic planners and the central planners must work together to create their draft economic plans based on the goals of the central government in Pyongyang. This draft economic plan is revised, reformed and then sent off to the central government and communicated to everyone in the DPRK.
As with STEP (Soviet-Type Economic Planning) and PTEP (Prussian-Type Economic Planning), NKEP has in fact suffered from the Economic Calculation Problem. The effects did not become apparent until 1973, the same year as the “Death of Bretton Woods” according to the SMP Compendium. The Compendium has addressed this issue vis-à-vis the Political Organization Problem in the Total Mobilization of Production for Dasein. It has enabled me to turn the US Economy, an alleged model of the Liberal Capitalists’ “Market/Mixed Economy,” into a Federalist Command Economy with 50 State Command Economies. I totally recommend reading Part One, Part Two, Part Three, and Part Four of “Strategic Accounting and Allocation of the Federal Budget” and “The Greater America Amendment.” I still find MTEP to be economic planning par excellence by always insisting that uncertainty will always be a given in economic conditions, imploring all central planners and economic planners to develop Situational Awareness.
Korean Weltgefühl: “A Technology of Our Style”
“People say I thrive on [Arbeit], and I do live up to this reputation [as both an Anarch and an Arbeiter]. My day flows by agreeably; I have plenty of time for my studies. But when the waves surge high, as during the [Eternal President’s] visits or at the banquets, I volunteer for cabin service, and I also wait tables, which is not normally [my Vocation]. My [Arbeit is] rewarded [accordingly in Geld] and known to everyone all the way up to the Domo [of Eumeswil]. This provides me with leisure when Emanuelo turns into Martin [on] the Luminar [Intranet software].”-Ernst Jünger, Eumeswil, ca. 1977
“The basis of the Juche Idea is [a Synthesis of the Figures of the Arbeiter and the Anarch as] the master of all things and the decisive factor in everything [through the Will-to-Power].”-Kim Il-sung, On Juche in Our Revolution Vol. 2, ca. 1977
There is an Implicit Intent as to why the North Koreans have been so adamant about pursuing Autarky, even in contexts where it would seem unnecessary. Internet memes ridiculing the DPRK for being “backward” and “outdated” have been propagated as a sort of spectacle. One has to wonder if these Internet memes on the World Wide Web (WWW) are being propagated to demonstrate the perceived superiority of the South Koreans. Not every aspect of Technology in the DPRK can be written off as being related to the Death of Bretton Woods. This Implicit Intent pertains to a discernible belief among North Koreans that Technology and the Figure of the Arbeiter must conform with the specifications of the DPRK. In essence, what is applicable to the ROK cannot be reapplied to the DPRK, accounting for why the DPRK continues to be hesitant and reluctant about being too straightforward with the rest of humanity.
South Korea, while NKEP was assuming its later forms within the same timeframe, was suffering from cases of corruption and bribery as well as a military coup. Protectionist measures were in place for what was originally a Mixed Economy, privatized commercial firms realizing Fordism-Taylorism through the importation of Liberal Capitalist Technology and “learning-by-doing” or, put another way in the Heideggerian-Jüngerian sense, “Learning-by-being–Liberal-Capitalist.” This particular phenomenon stems from historical ROK economic policies related to “Import-Substitution Industrialization” (ISI), creating the future conditions conducive to the Total Mobilization of Production for Profit as evidenced by the presences of “Directly Unproductive Profit-Seeking Activities” (DUP). When General Park Chung Hee achieved his military coup of the ROK in May 1961, South Korean economic policies shifted toward “Export Promotion” (EP) through low Interest Rates and the introduction of Fordism-Taylorism, EP gradually replacing ISI and bringing Production for Profit into existence.
South Korea’s EP Policy followed the usual procedures in Liberal Capitalist regimes between the 1960s and 1970s. Economic conditions were similar to those of West Germany, Japan, and Italy. The Quantity of Kapital in existence surpassed the Quantity of Schuld in existence as long as the ROK continued manufacturing large Quantities of low-Quality goods and services at lower Prices. The Parliamentary Democracy in Seoul had the ROK’s Financial Markets serve as the surrogates to the DPRK’s Central Planning Committees, only achieving results under after the Death of Bretton Woods. When the Death of Bretton Woods occurred, the DPRK Command Economy suddenly stagnated and has not yet recovered from it ever since.
The 1977 South Korean Romance film, Night Journey, is set against the backdrop of the deteriorating financial conditions in 1970s ROK after the Death of Bretton Woods. I totally recommend it if anybody is interested. The eponymous lovers are bank tellers overwhelmed by Meaningless Work, dealing in Kapital and Schuld under the Incentives of Supply and Demand:
“Hyeon-ju is a middle-aged woman frustrated with a society unable to keep up with her desires. Her relationship with her supervisor is kept a secret. Though she pushes for the only security available to her, in lucid moments, she knows a marriage of convenience is not what she desires—least of all to a dullard unable to satisfy her. Having an unconventional taste for masochism, she wants to be taken, perhaps against her will. Haunted by the unfulfilled promise of her tempestuous first love—killed at war—Hyeon-ju sees only banal conformity, an orgy of pleasure-seeking without passion. About to explode, she roams the streets in search of something to shake up her existence.”
The “forbidden relationship” of this unmarried couple, including the themes of Extended Adolescence, is a byproduct of financial nihilism in the ROK (which continues to affect the country in its declining birthrates and rising cases of Death-by-Overwork), the assassination of General Park in 1979, and the Economic Liberalization of the South Korean Mixed Economy into the Market Economy through Liberal Capitalist Fintech (Financial Technology). Currency is the means by which we issue commands to others, Fintech only serving to refine this specific conception of Currency. To quote the SMP Compendium entry “Intent”:
“The Liberal Capitalists may deny this or never realize why the German word ‘Schuld’ [Debt/Guilt] best describes Kapital, but their conception of Currency affects how everyone in any nation value their Work. People lose sight of why they are doing something and why they exist to begin with because so much of their time and effort is being spent on trying to pay off the Schuld and generate the greatest amount of Kapital with the most pleasure for the least amount of pain. We tend to see this behavior manifest itself in different variations. There are privatized labor unions going on strike to demand higher and higher wages to the detriment of other labor unions, privatized commercial firms driving other firms into inexistence, pensioners demanding larger sums in their pensions, governments levying higher and higher taxes, and corporate lobbyists and special interests subverting the political process for their own personal gain. Here, a very simplistic conception of human existence, “Homo Economicus,” exists in an ideological mold that everyone must conform to the detriment of all other cultural, religious, ethnic, and national identities.”
But these behaviors are not conducive to a healthy, prosperous, and orderly nation. Socialism does not arise as the belief that the working class should be paid more or that the state should control the means of production. The demand for economic freedom through Socialism consistently arises as the demand for a different conception of Work which is antithetical to Liberal Capitalist ideology. What Socialism advocates for is a different economic order, a different way of doing things and its interpretation affected by everyone who is a part of the nation-state. The “Socialism” of one country differs from the “Socialism” of a neighboring country and vice versa. Culture, tradition, faith, history, nationality, and other key sociological traits are what define each Socialism in its attempts to implement an entirely distinct conception of Work [called Arbeit].”
The North Koreans are well-aware of what has been happening to the South Koreans since the Death of Bretton Woods, demonstrating cautiousness and skepticism toward Liberal Capitalist Technologies. It is part of the Implicit Intent as to why the Songun Policy and Juche had been developed in the specific manners that they were conceptualized and communicated. However, as with the Soviet Union, PRC and the rest of the Eastern Bloc countries, even the DPRK had to make compromises because the onslaught of Kapital and Schuld around the world was turning the wartime-related deaths of all the wars in the 20th century into statistics on financial ledgers.
I have yet to find another soul on the face of the Earth who is fully self-aware of why the DPRK appears to be constantly restless and waiting for something. The impression I have always been given about Pyongyang is that Korean Reunification must happen in a Korean manner only. The Reunification of East Germany and West Germany is an experience related to the German Reich; the Reunification of North Vietnam and South Vietnam is an experience only related to Vietnam. The effects of Fordism-Taylorism have manifested themselves in Liberal Capitalist observations of the DPRK because they are essentially expecting Pyongyang and Seoul to be more like West Germany and East Germany or be more like North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The Foreign Policy of the Democratic-Republican Party is suggestive of this because the Jeffersonians and Madisonians are only viewing the North Korea nuclear weapons program begun in Yongbyon under the Incentives of Supply and Demand. The difference between an “Economic Sanction” and a “Labor Strike” are both nil for the Intents of Command and Obedience. The ideology’s metaphysical limitations on the Korean Peninsula are made apparent thanks to its own Freedom-Security Dialectic allowing the Korean War to continue for the better part of a century.
What does it mean when Pyongyang prefers Korean Reunification being done in a Korean manner? the DPRK knows that the only way to reunite with the ROK is through a Socialistic form of Economic Foreignization. Economic Foreignization in general requires specific conceptions of Currency, Finance, Technology and Fintech. The DPRK prefers its Economic Foreignization to be reflective of the Weltgefühl (World-Feeling) driving the Korean Essence: They want to convince everyday Koreans in the ROK and around the world that, by supporting Korean Reunification, there will be peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. It is never a question of Who will be reuniting Korea and How they will go about doing it; that is the metaphysical essence of the “Korean Mousetrap.” Therefore, in retrospect, what will it take for both Koreas to achieve Reunification and Why should they be pursuing Reunification in a particular manner that is actually beneficial for all Koreans and the rest of the world by extension?
Korean Weltgefühl: “Freedom and Equality in Our Style”
“When describing my free evening at the Casbah, I neglected to mention the chess game. The board is near the wine and the fruit; it must not be touched. The game has only an opponent, but not an enemy. It is played as an agon between equals. Hence it is created no less for the Anarch than for [Authoritarians] – the bold attack, the cunning snare laid for the player, arouses Olympic contentment in him. He can, as I do here in the Casbah, play against himself. The match goes on throughout a service period. To save moves, I first build up one of the opening gambits that have stood the test since Philidor. Then the game begins. It is limited to one move per day; the interval is enough to make me forget the motives that spurred me the previous day. The man who plays against himself must not look over his shoulder.”-Ernst Jünger, Eumeswil, ca. 1977
“[The Figures of the Arbeiter and the Anarch are the greatest beings] endowed with independence, creativity and consciousness and, at the same time, [beautiful creatures] who [champion] justice. [They], by nature, aspire to virtue and ennobling qualities and detests all that is evil and dirty [by going beyond Good and Evil]. These unique features constitute his human traits.”-Kim Il-sung, Reminiscences: With the Century, ca. 1992
Being a Tourist in North Korea, the Federalist American Union, the German Reich and just any other member-state in the WSO is as rewarding as a high-stakes chess game. The game begins and ends with You, the person reading this Blog post, regardless of whether You are literally entering the DPRK or not. Here, the reward for playing is a once in a lifetime opportunity from the Eternal President to become the Übermensch in a sort of Jungian Individuation: all You have do is demonstrate a personal self-mastery of the Socialist conceptions of Freedom and Equality. Begin by gracing the Totality of this foreign Land with your Persona–“Your Self”–from Command-Obedience Bookkeeping:
State = Totality + Self
Self = Owned-Self
The “Self” becomes your “Owned-Self” in reference to the Self-Ownership and Self-Sovereignty concepts in the Socialist conception of Property Rights. Where neither DPRK/ROK nor Korean Totality exists and where “The Author of The Fourth Estate” is nothing more than just a figment of your imagination, you begin to develop an acute awareness of the obvious fact that this Owned-Self of yours is also related to the “Life-Energy” concept.
Whenever you choose to pursue a Vocation to contribute Arbeit and generate Geld under the Work-Standard, you are allowing your Owned-Self to commit Life-Energy – physical, mental and spiritual strength – toward the contribution of Arbeit and the generation of Geld within the Life-Energization Reciprocity (LER) Process.
Your Owned-Self represents the two halves of your waking consciousness: the They-Self (what Jung called the “Shadow”) and the Mine-Self (what Jung called the “Ego”):
Owned-Self = They-Self + Mine-Self
Life-Energy = Shadow + Ego
Your Mine-Self plays the game against your They-Self, touring various locations throughout the DPRK with the State-sanctioned chaperone. Do you still believe the Jeffersonians when they claim your life could come to a tragic end like “Otto Fredrick Warmbier?” Are you aware of the obscure historical fact that Warmbier, a student from Thomas Jefferson’s University of Virginia, had left him incapable of comprehending Socialism’s most basic conceptions of Freedom and Equality? Was the DPRK really the perpetrator behind the alleged ‘murder’ of Otto Warmbier (“His Owned-Self”) or, as the Supreme Guide and Donald Trump are both convinced, was Otto Warmbier (“His Mine-Self”) murdered by Otto Warmbier (“His They-Self”)?
As outlandish as this may sound, the legal court proceedings in the DPRK are adamant that Warmbier ‘killed himself’. They literally thought Warmbier was a Terrorist masquerading as a Tourist. What made this possible and why did it have to happen in that particular manner?
- The University of Virginia (UVA) is governed by the Incentives of Supply and Demand, from the Student Loans to the costs of room and board at UVA dormitories. UVA’s conception of Property Rights is “Private Property-as-Wealth” and “Common Property-as-Wealth.”
- The DPRK is governed by the Intents of Command and Obedience, as evidenced by NKEP. Their conception of Property is Productive Property-as-Power and Personal Property-as-Power.
- Warmbier was in fact a trained Economist who should have known these stark differences. He went into the DPRK knowing neither the rules nor even the slightest awareness on how to play the game itself. At the hotel where he was staying, the Yanggakdo International Hotel, he tried stealing a large propaganda poster on the second floor, which is already in itself a serious violation of the DPRK’s State Sovereignty under the Socialist conception of Property Rights. The action was met by an equally serious violation of Warmbier’s Self-Sovereignty–a 15 year prison sentence.
- Is stealing a propaganda poster for Kapital worth dying for if it means paying off the Schuld of University Tuition? The problem that I have here is whether other important information has been omitted or even edited out of the historical record by the Democratic-Republican Party. Basically, I had to go out of my way to stitch the following information together from a variety of sources.
On Thomas Jefferson’s Cult of Personality
“Secret Societies have arisen at U.Va. and many other schools, usually motivated by a desire to preserve the traditions of the institution, explained Wayne Cozart, vice president for development at the U.Va. Alumni Association and executive director of the Jefferson Trust, who has worked with U.Va. students and alumni for more than 25 years.
The Z Society, founded in 1892, is the oldest still-secret society at U.Va. If members of the group are asked about their membership, they must leave the room rather than answer the question (or lie), a turn of events that is ‘quite interesting to watch,’ he said.
Thomas Jefferson’s birthday, April 13, is best day of the year to witness an act by one of U.Va.’s several secret societies, almost all of which tend to be active on the day that best symbolizes a commitment to the university’s traditions[.]”
The University found itself making history during World War II, when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave the commencement speech at Memorial Gymnasium on June 10, 1940, explained the University’s historian, Alexander “Sandy” Gilliam.
The entire campus of UVA is best summarized as a Liberal Capitalist SSE behaving like a Deep State inside of the Unified Federalist SSE by furthering the Empire of Liberty as part of its traditions. Jefferson and his two protégés, Madison and Monroe, had intended UVA to be the ideological vanguard of the Democratic-Republican Party’s SSE:
“Jefferson included the creation of the University of Virginia as one of three accomplishments for which he most wished to be remembered. Years after the end of his presidency, at the age of seventy-six, he spearheaded the legislative campaign for the university’s charter, secured its location, designed its buildings, planned its curriculum, and served as its first rector. It was his last great public service.”
Even UVA’s online website is very open about it:
“In his quest to reinvent higher education in America, Jefferson sought to cultivate an environment in which students and faculty could live and learn from one another. The result was a revolution: the Academical Village. Designed to foster cross-disciplinary exchange, Jefferson’s design housed faculty from a range of specialties around a central Lawn. Students lived in single rooms between professors’ homes. At the head of their shared Lawn stood the library (also known as the Rotunda). And at the Lawn’s foot lay a panoramic view of the mountains, suggestive of the intellectual frontiers that lay open to discovery. [S]cholars and professors could exercise their ingenuity, develop the tools of self-governance and push the boundaries of knowledge in service to [the Pursuit of Temporary Happiness in opposition to Pursuit of Eternal Glory].”
Its most important alumni was President Woodrow Wilson, the same Wilson who also tried getting America to sign the Versailles Treaty and enter the League of Nations, both of which were later succeeded by the 2+4 Agreement and the United Nations. To quote what I had written in “World State Organization (Pt. I of II)”:
“And even though Jefferson did not know what would become of the [Empire of Liberty] over the next two centuries, his idea later became the basis of Democratic-Republican foreign policy under Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. What Americans and non-Americans have forgotten or simply chose to forget is that contemporary America is still dealing with an irreparable fissure created by Jefferson’s vision of the American Empire of Liberty clashes and in opposition to the vision of Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist American Union.”
Warmbier confessed to being a UVA student who tried to become a member of the “Z Society.” The Z Society and its historical rival, the “7 Society,” are philanthropic Secret Societies with political connections to the Democratic-Republican Party. We can tell, without even knowing who its members are, based on what is already known about both. The Z Society adheres to the Jeffersonian conception of social status based on Blood and Wealth (as opposed to the Hamiltonian conception based on Rank and Achievement). The 7 Society bears the Cult of Personality because the only way to contact is to write a message, deliver it to a Statue of Thomas Jefferson, then wait and see if they reply back. This particular Statue is significant because it is located at the “UVA Rotunda,” a location which Jefferson himself had specifically insisted that it ought to function like the Pantheon of Ancient Rome, as if his Intent was to create a Cult of Personality around himself. After all, the original Pantheon of Ancient Rome was designed for that same Intent – to create a Cult of Personality around the “Divine Authority” of the Roman Imperial Cult.
More importantly, when the “Hitlerists” did their religious torchlight procession with Tiki torches (and not actual torchlights) on August 11, 2017, they specifically went to the UVA Rotunda to further the Enlightenment with the harassing “Trotskyists.” What was one of the slogans chanted by the Hitlerists heading to the Rotunda? An invocation of the “Reichsnährstand” (Reich Food Estate Law) of 1933’s slogan, “Blut und Boden” (Blood and Soil), in a Jeffersonian context is to commemorate Thomas Jefferson’s quest to turn America into a dystopian Utopia of Producerism and Consumerism in the “‘Six Alls’ of Total Mobilization of Production for Profit.”
Even if one is not a Roman Catholic, one ought to realize that Bishop St. Johann Nepomuk Neumann of Bohemia, like the North Koreans, was also relying on the Intents of Command and Obedience in His Excellency’s warnings anyone who dares to join any secret society:
“Secret societies have been formed lately among infidels and non-Catholics; for instance, the Freemasons, the Oddfellows, and the Order of Red Men. All assert that the only object of their association is fraternal benevolence and mutual support. But this is merely a specious cloak. The very oath tendered by them, viz., secrecy as to what goes on in their meetings, is a sufficient reason to suspect their intention, and to warn Catholics against communication with them. The show of philanthropy and the temporal advantages their members have induced the major part of German Protestants to swell their ranks. Under pain of exclusion from the sacraments, the Provincial Council has forbidden Catholics to join such societies. Notwithstanding the prohibition, many have been enticed into them, and the sad consequences are that they have fallen away from the Faith.”
Neither Left, Nor Right, Nor Center!
“I would like to be something, if it did not cost so much Geld.”-Bishop St. Johann Nepomuk Neumann, CSsR
“Faith lifts the Soul, Hope supports it, Experience says it must and Love says…let it be!”–Mother St. Elizabeth Ann Seton, SC
Why did the Hitlerists chant “Blood and Soil” in their religious veneration of Thomas Jefferson’s ideal of “Blood and Wealth?” What can be inferred from its significance? A phrase like “Blood and Soil” can be rewritten as “Jus Sanguinis” (Citizenship Law Relating to Blood) and “Jus Soli” (Citizenship Law Relating to Soil). The people who went to Unite the Right and the people went to protest are in fact one and the same insofar as both demonstrated sheer ignorance of Citizenship Laws from Ancient Rome. The Charlottesville counterdemonstration had behaved no differently than the Pan-Germanic Socialists of the NSDAP who claimed in their 25 Points Program that they wished to oppose Roman Law’s Blood and Soil Citizenship because President Obama and the Jeffersonians in 2014 passed a law befitting of Hitlerism in an ironic manner.
Liberal Capitalist regimes aligned with the Empire of Liberty rely on Blood and Soil to determine Citizenship: Jus Soli determines citizenship being born there, whereas Jus Sanguinis involves becoming the citizen of a nation by having been born there. A man like St. Johann Neumann of Bohemia is a complete stranger and an enemy of the Jeffersonians under this definition insofar as His Excellency promoted Rank and Achievement with Vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience. The latter is the most important of all as it pertains to the Intents of Command and Obedience as part of a Sacred Oath to serve and pledge allegiance to. Is there a better way to determine citizenship in any of the member-states at the WSO?
I literally had to point this out on the ARPLAN Blog:
“My problem with those Points in the Hitlerists’ 25 Points is that it gives the German Reich broad powers to deprive anyone of their rights and citizenship with the right evidence, be it real or imaginary. I say this because aspects of those seven particular Points have an American equivalent passed by the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican Party under President Obama in 2014.
To give you a personal example, Bogumil: A Prussian family has twin grandchildren (a son and a daughter) in these United States who are considered US Citizens under Federal Law and are treated as such by the United States Census Bureau. Those two are somewhat aware of why their family wants them to remember why they are Prussians, their parents and cousins reminding them that they “are technically eligible for German Citizenship under international law.” Also, if the American Volksgemeinschaften have historical evidence proving their grandfather, a naturalized US Citizen who emigrated from East Prussia, is in fact a registered NSDAP member and Waffen-SS Obersturmführer (First Lieutenant), the Federal government is allowed to deny their grandfather any further Social Security payments under “House Resolution 5739.”
In essence, how should the United States or the German Reich determine who is an American and who is a German? Are these Prussian twins “US Citizens” or “German Citizens?” Are they “Prussian” because:
1. They have an ancestral bloodline that can be traced back to East Prussia on both their paternal and maternal sides, including the serious legal accusations directed against their paternal grandfather?
2. They have an unconscious affiliation with Prussian culture and their adherence to Roman Catholicism reflective of their Prussian mentality?
3. They have spirit affinity toward Prussia, which basically involves them having their Confirmation Saints be the Patron Saints of Catholic Education, Ss. Johann Neumann, CSsR, of Bohemia and Elizabeth Ann Seton, SC, of New York and restlessly searching for the “Prussian Style” in an Empire of Liberty where Prussia no longer exists under international law?
[T]he Mind-Body Problem of Rene Descartes prevents international law from providing a definitive judgment on those twin siblings. International law likes to think that the first and second paragraphs pertain to the Body and the Mind. The third paragraph, however, is the Soul which unites the Body and the Mind.
Categories: Third Place
Leave a Reply